POLITIK INSTITUSI REZIM INTERNASIONAL (KONSEP DAN PENDEKATAN ANALISIS)

  • Rendi Prayuda Universitas Islam Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
  • Syafri Harto Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
Keywords: politics, institution, international and regime.

Abstract

The concept of international anarchy initially clarifies the absence of actors in international politics of the supernatural organization in the practice of international relations. But the existence of international regime in international politics currently affects the pattern of relations between countries in creating and facilitating the creation and international cooperation. This article analyzes the concepts and approaches of international regime studies by using a qualitative, descriptive approach conducted by a literature study method. The results of this study show that the international regime is the specific actualisation of international organisations formed in a centralistic, independent and rationality. An analysis approach to the international regime is carried out with a rationalist and reflectiveal approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer, Volker Rittberger, 1996, “ Interests, Power, Knowledge: The Study of International Regimes”, Mershon International Studies Review, Vol. 40, No. 2.
Haggard, Stephan and Simmons, B.A. 1997. “Theories of International Regimes.” International Organization 41, 3, pdf copy (World Peace Foundation and The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Summer.
Kenneth W. Abbot dan Suncan Snidal. 1998. Why states act throught Formal International Organizations. Journal Conflict Resolution. Vol 42. London. SAGE Publication.
Keohane, Robert. 2004. The Demand of International Regime. New Jersey: Cambridge University Press.
Krasner, Stephen D. 1982. “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables.” International Organization 36/2 (Spring). Reprinted in Stephen D. Krasner, ed., International Regimes, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
_________________. 2005. “Cooperation and International Regimes After Hegemony Cooperation: an Discord in The World Political Economy”. NY: Cornell University Press.
Martha Finnemore. Norms, Culture and World Politics: Insight from Sociology’s Institutionalism. Journal International Organization. Vol 50. The International Organization Foundation and The Massachusets Institute of Technology.
Robert O Keohane. 1998. International Institutions: Two Approaches. Harvard University: International Studies Quarterly No 32. 379-396.
Rosenau, James N. and Ernst-Otto Czempiel, eds. (1992). Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tony, Evans and Peter, Wilson 2002, ‘Regime Theory and the English School of International Relations: A Comparison’, Millennium 21.
_______________. 1997. “Introduction: three perspectives on international regimes”, dalam Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
_____________________. “Interest-based theories: political market failure, situation and problem structures, and institutional bargaining”, dalam Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Young, Oran R. 1982. "Regime Dynamics: The Rise and Fall of International Regimes". London: Cornell University Press.
Published
2019-10-27
Abstract viewed = 13 times
PDF downloaded = 32 times