DIPLOMASI INDONESIA DALAM MEMASUKAN CPO PADA ENVIRONMENTAL GOODS LIST DI APEC PADA TAHUN 2012-2017

Authors

  • Maria Anastasia Siagian UPN Veteran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25299/jdis.2019.vol2(02).5118

Keywords:

Environmental Goods, Development Products, CPO, Diplomacy, APEC

Abstract

Indonesia, being the top global CPO producer, makes CPO as one of their national interest due to the great contribution of CPO to Indonesia’s economics as well as to their citizens. This brings Indonesia to utilize regional forums, viz. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), in order to build Indonesia’s CPO image and also to gain from tariff reductionto 5% or less through the Environmental Goods (EGs) intiative in 2012. Lack of success in Indonesia’s diplomacy in the EGs initiative have failed its goal to have CPO included in the EGs list. Hence, in 2013 Indonesia managed to shift its strategy by initiating the Development Products which also have CPO included in the products list Indonesia proposed. Up until 2017, no decisions and deals were made among the APEC countries regarding Indonesia’s Development Products initiative. This research aims to analyze the negotiations process which Indonesia had done through EGs to Development Products using the qualitative research approach. This research finds that the result of this negotiation is the result of the power structure between Indonesia and their opponents during the negotiation of both EGs and Development Products.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

APEC. (2008). 2008 APEC Ministerial Meeting. https://www.apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Annual-Ministerial-Meetings/2008/2008_amm
APEC. (2012). Leaders’ Declaration ANNEX C - APEC List of Environmental Goods.
APEC. (2019a). Proposal. https://aimp2.apec.org/sites/PDB/Lists/Proposals/DispForm.aspx?ID=1921
APEC. (2019b). The APEC List of Environmental Goods APEC Policy Support Unit Policy Brief No. 5. https://www.apec.org/Publications/2012/11/The-APEC-List-of-Environmental-Goods
Berridge, G. R. (2010). Diplomacy: Theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
Bisnis. (2014). 5 Produk Indonesia Dapat 15 Kode HS di APEC. https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20140530/12/231804/5-produk-indonesia-dapat-15-kode-hs-di-apec
BUMN. (2013). Diplomasi Sawit yang Memble. http://www.bumn.go.id/ptpn6/berita/1355
CIFOR. (2009). The Impact and Opputunities of Oil Palm in South East Asia. https://www.cifor.org/library/2792/
Departemen Perindustrian. (2007). Gambaran Sekilas Industri Minyak Kelapa Sawit. http://www.kemenperin.go.id/download/289/Paket-Informasi-Komoditi-Minyak-Kelapa-Sawit
Djamhur, A. E. S. (2015). Kepentingan Amerika Serikat Menghalangi Crude Palm Oil (CPO) Indonesia Masuk Kedalam EG List (Environmental Goods List) APEC Tahun 2012. JOM FISIP, 2(2), 1–12.
Gapki. (2017). Sejarah Kelapa Sawit Indonesia. https://gapki.id/news/3652/video-sejarah-kelapa-sawit-indonesia
Info Sawit. (2017). Diplomasi ‘DevPro’ Indonesia di Forum APEC. https://www.infosawit.com/news/6271/diplomasi----devpro----indonesia-di-forum-apec
Info Sawit. (2019). Dampak Isu Black Campaign Di Indonesia Terhadap Industri Sawit. https://www.infosawit.com/news/9268/dampak-isu-black-campaign-di-indonesia-terhadap-industri-sawit
Kementerian Luar Negeri RI. (2013). Majalah Akses Edisi ke-25: UKM di Tengah Pusarah APEC. 3–39.
Kementerian Perdagangan RI. (2014). Analisa Dampak Implementasi Environmental Goods List (EGs List) dan Identifikasi Development Products Terhadap Kinerja Perdagangan. https://www.kemendag.go.id/files/pdf/2015/01/16/Analisa Dampak Implementasi Environmental Goods (EGS) List dan Identifikasi Development Products terhadap Kinerja Perdagangan EGS List.pdf
Kementerian Perdagangan RI. (2018). BRIEF PERUNDINGAN ASIA PACIFIC ECONOMIC COOPERATION (APEC). http://ditjenppi.kemendag.go.id/index.php/apec-oi/apec/sekilas-apec
Kementerian Perdagangan RI. (2019). Ekspor 10 Komoditi Utama Periode 2014-2019. https://www.kemendag.go.id/id/economic-profile/10-main-and-potential-commodities
OECD. (2007). Environment and Regional Trade Agreements. https://www.oecd.org/env/38599709.pdf
Pfetsch, F. R. (2007). Negotiation and the Theory of Negotiation. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Republika. (2012a). Kegagalan CPO Akibat Kelemahan Negosiasi. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/ekonomi/makro/12/09/18/maj71y-kegagalan-cpo-akibat-kelemahan-negosiasi
Republika. (2012b). RI Siap Perjuangkan CPO di APEC 2013. https://nasional.republika.co.id/berita/nasional/umum/12/10/04/mbdg2n-ri-siap-perjuangkan-cpo-di-apec-2013
United Nations Economic and Social Council. (2018). Summary of the Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report 2018. https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/CTI_1_item 2 - summary APTIR 2018_E_0.pdf
WTO. (2014). Environmental Goods Agreement. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/ega_e.htm

Downloads

Published

2019-10-27