Revitalisasi Peran Perangkat Kewilayahan Melalui Pelimpahan Sebagian Kewenangan Bupati Fakfak Kepada Kepala Distrik Fakfak
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25299/jkp.2023.vol9(2).14723Keywords:
Revitalization of Roles, Regional Instruments, Delegation of AuthorityAbstract
The authority given to several fields overlaps, for example authority has been given in accordance with Regent Regulation Number 33 of 2012 concerning the Delegation of Part of the Regent's Authority to District Heads in the Fakfak Regency Government Environment, but in practice this is not the case, the agencies at the Regency level are in charge of the field/sector In fact, they almost never coordinate with the District, so that the functions of the District according to Regent Regulation Number 33 of 2012 are not carried out properly. This research uses a qualitative method with a descriptive approach using theory from Iglesias (Kaho, 1997: 59) with primary and secondary data sources. Data collection techniques were carried out using interviews, observation and documentation, data analysis techniques used were data reduction and drawing conclusions. Based on the research results, it was concluded that the ideal revitalization of the role of regional apparatus through delegating the authority of the Regent of Fakfak to the Head of the Fakfak District must be followed by increasing financial capacity, apparatus capability, community participation and non-human resource capabilities. The implementation of the role of regional apparatus through the delegation of part of the authority of the Regent of Fakfak to the Head of the Fakfak District has not been optimal, where the delegation of authority for the fields of government, economic development, education and health and civil service has not been fully followed by giving full authority to the Head of the District, or it seems still half-hearted because The district head's space for movement is always monitored by the regent regarding the implementation of his authority. The process of delegating authority is still not able to run optimally because the district's resources are still limited so that service activities are not yet optimally felt by the community.
Downloads
References
AG. Subarsono. 2006. Analisis Kebijakan Publik: Konsep Teori dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Ali, Maulana Eko. 2012. Kepemimpinan Transformasional dalam Birokrasi Pemerintahan. Jakarta (ID): Multicerdas Publishing.
Anderson, James E, 2003, Public Policy Making: An Introduction Fifth Edition, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company
Aries Djaenuri dan Enceng.2014. Sistem Pemerintahan Daerah. Tangerang Selatan: Universitas Terbuka
Aziz, Abdul. 2003. Desentralisasi Pemerintahan, Pengalaman Negara-Negara Asia , Pustaka Amanah, Bantul Yogyakarta;
Boonsiri,Karn & Phiritasamith, Sucheep, 2016. Development of Participative Management of Subdistrict Administrative Organizations in Songkhla Province. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management Vol.24 No.2 (May - August, 2016) pp. 64-68.
Bungin, Burhan, 2006, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Cohen Steven, dkk. 2011. Menjadi Manajer Publik Efektif. Menciptakan Kinerja Tinggi Organisasi Pemerintah. Jakarta:PPM
Creswell, John W. 2015. Penelitian Kualitatif & Desain Riset. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
Djohermansyah Djohan. 2014. Merajut Otonomi. Daerah Pada Era Reformasi (Kasus Indonesia). Jakarta: IKAPTK.
Darmawan, I. (2011). E-Government : Studi Pendahuluan di Kabupaten Sragen. Procceding Simposium Nasional Otonomi Daerah.
Djaenuri, Aries (2012). Hubungan Keuangan Pusat-Daerah. Jakarta: Indonesia Ghalia.
Dessler, Garry, 2013 Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT Prenhalindo.
Febrian, R. A., Rahman, K., Yuza, A. F., & Zainal, Z. (2023). Local government innovation model in Pekanbaru City, Indonesia: a study of public service mall. Otoritas: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 13(2), 302-314.
Fung, Archon. 2013. Infotopia: Unleashing the Democratic Power of Transparency. Politics & Society, 41, SAGE Publication.
Hamdi Muchlis, 2014. Kebijakan publik: proses, analisis, dan partisipasi. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Hamidi, Jazim. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Malang: UMM Press.
Desentralisasi dan Otonomi Daerah Dari Segi Ilmu Administrasi Negara”, UI Jakarta.
Istianto, Bambang.2011. Manajemen Pemerintahan Dalam Persfektif Pelayanan Publik. Jakarta:Mitra Wacana Media.
Juniarso Ridwan dan Achmad Sodik Sudrajat.2009. Hukum Administrasi Negara dan Kebijakan Pelayanan Publik,Bandung : Nuansa.
Kartasasmita, Ginandjar, Revitalisasi Administrasi Publik Dalam Mewujudkan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan, Makalah, Disampaikan pada Acara Wisuda ke 44 Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lembaga Administrasi Negara, Jakarta, 2007
Labolo, Muhadam. Kawulusan, Megandaru. 2015. Dialektika Ilmu Pemerintahan.Bogor: Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia
Mustamin Dg. Mattutu, dkk. 2004. Mandat, Delegasi, Atribusi, dan Implementasinya Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Tim UII Press.
Nawawi, Hadari. 2003. Metode Penelitian Sosial. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Ndraha, Tafiziduhu, 2011.Kybernologi; Ilmu pemerintahan Baru,Jakarta;PT, Rineka Cipta
Nugroho, Riant. 2017. Public Policy; Dinamika Kebijakan Publik, Analisis Kebijakan Publik, Manajemen Politik Kebijakan Publik, Etika Kebijakan Publik, Kimia Kebijakan Publik. Jakarta. PT. Elex Media Komputindo.
Nurman, N., Yulastin, T., & Zainal, Z. (2023). Strategy for The Development of Pacu Jalur Tourism Objects In Increasing Regional Original Income. International Journal of Economics Development Research (IJEDR), 4(3), 968-979.
Rivai, Basri, 2014, Penilaian Prestasi Kerja Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta: PT. Ganudra Pustaka Utama.
Salusu, J. 2010. Pengambilan Keputusan Stratejik Untuk Organisasi Publik dan Organisasi Non Profit. Jakarta: Grasindo .
Simangunsong, Fer. (2021). Isi Orasi Ilmiah Guru Besar Fernandes Simangunsong 2020-2021, (November 2020).
Soekidjo.2010. Pendekatan Manusiawi dan Organisasi Terhadap Pembinaan Kepegawaian, Jakarta: Gunung Agung
Sumarto Hetifa Sj, Inovasi, Partisipasi dan Good Governance, (Bandung: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2003), hal 1-2
Sumaryadi, I Nyoman, 2010, Sosiologi Pemerintahan – Dari Perspektif Pelayanan, Pemberdayaan, Interaksi, dan Sistem Kepemipinan Pemerintahan Indonesia, Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia
Suradinata, Ermaya. 2018. etika pemerintahan Geopolitik Indonesia. Jatinangor:Alqaprint Jatinangor
Thaha, Rasyid.2012 penataan kelembagaan pemerintah daerah, jurnal ilmiah ilmu pemerintah vol 1.(3) : 38-55
Wijaya, HAW, 2004. Penyelenggaraan Otonomi di Indonesia, , PT Rajagrafindo Persada Jakarta
Wasistiono, Sadu. 2013, Kepemimpinan Pemerintahan. Jakarta: IPDN.
Sadu, Simangunsong, Fernandes. 2015. Metodologi Ilmu Pemerintahan; Edisi Revisi yang Diperluas. Jatinangor: IPDN
Zainal, Z., & Putra, R. N. (2022). Implementation of Update Voter Data on Election of Governor and Vice Governor of Riau in Bengkalis Regency. Jurnal Kajian Pemerintah: Journal of Government, Social and Politics, 8(2), 1-15.
2.png)
