HUKUM INVESTASI DITINJAU DARI THE PRINCIPLE OF SOVEREIGN EQUALITY

Authors

  • Erlina Universitas Islam Riau
  • Zulherman Idris Universitas Islam Riau
  • Radian Suparba Universitas Islam Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25299/jkp.2023.vol9(2).14227

Keywords:

Principle Of Sovereign Equality, Investment.

Abstract

The results of the WTO panel's decision were recorded in the DS 592 lawsuit. The final panel report was issued on October 17, 2022, stating that the export policy and the obligation to process and refine nickel minerals in Indonesia proved to violate WTO Article XI provisions. GATT 1994 and cannot be justified by Article XI.2 (a) and XX (d) GATT 1994. The purpose of the provisions of WTO Article XI.1 GATT 1994 states that each WTO member country is prohibited from making restrictions other than tariffs, taxes and other duties , and not other restrictions including quotas and licensing of imports or sales in the framework of export. There are two consequences that will be faced by Indonesia, including having to pay losses to the European Union (EU) as the plaintiff arising from the nickel export ban. Second, facing retaliation from the European Union's ban on other Indonesian commodities or in fiscal prohibition instruments. Problems in the field of capital loading are related to demands and threats to the principle of equality of sovereignty against investors who are treated differently, amid demands to make as much profit as possible. The principle can be a way out for investors to withdraw from investing in arbitration or court courts, so that Indonesia will suffer losses. Thus, it is necessary to explain the concept to understand the principle of sovereign equality and its influence in Indonesian laws and regulations in the field of capital protection, so as to provide a clear picture of the treatment of investors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Book
Hendrik Budi Untung, Hukum Investasi, Penerbit Sinar Grafika, Cetakan Ketiga, 2017, Jakarta;
Johannes Ibrahim Dan Lindawaty Sewu, Hukum Bisnis Dalam Perspektif Manusia Modern, Penerbit: Refika Aditama, Cetakan Kedua, 2017, Bandung;
Dr.Sentosa Sembiring,SH,MH, Hukum Investasi, penerbit nuansa aulia, cetakan ketiga, Bandung, 2018;
Fabio Morosini, Reconceptualizing International Investment Law from the Global South, Cambridge University Press,England, 2017;
Suparji, Pokok-Pokok Pengaturan Penanaman Modal Di Indonesia, UAI Press, Jakarta Selatan,2016;
Nasution, Asmin, Transparansi dalam Penanaman Modal, Medan: Pustaka Bangsa Press, 2008;

Journal
Adelina Br Tarigan “Modal Yang Terkait Dengan Perdagangan ( Trade Related Investment Measures / Trims ) Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2007 Tentang Penanaman Modal”, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan. 2018;
Andrean Fernando, “Politik Hukum Peningkatan Investasi Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Usaha Mikro Kecil Dan Menengah,” Jurnal Lex Renaissance 7, no. 1 (2022).
Andrew Rosser, The Politics of Economic Liberalization in Indonesia: State, Market and Power, Richmond, Surrey : Curzon, 2002;
Budiono, Ekonomi Internasional. Badan Penerbitan Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2001, Yogyakarta;
Berliana Ciwi Linda,Jeany Anita Kermite dan Maya Karundeng, Kajian Hukum Internasional Terhadap Negara Yang Melanggar Prinsip-Prinsip Wto (World Trade Organization), Artikel Fakultas Hukum Unsrat., LEX PRIVATUM Vol 10, No 4 (2022), ISSN: 2337-4942
Cristina Elena Popa (TACHE, “Principles of International Law of Investments, Recognition and Trajectory 1,” Juridical Tribune Journal , ), Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Law Department, vol. 7 (Special), October. 2021;
Dhaniswara K. Harjono, “Hukum Penanaman Modal: Tinjauan Terhadap Pemberlakuan Undang Undang No. 25 Tahun 2007 Tentang Penanaman Modal,” no. 25 ,2012,:
Erlina, E., Idris, Z., & Zaharnika, R. F. A. (2022). Akibat Hukum Dalam Pembiayaan Konsumen Yang Tidak Disertai Dengan Perjanjian Fidusia. JKIH: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 1(2), 134-145.
Huala Adolf, “Artikel Kehormatan: Sengketa Penanaman Modal Antara Investor Melawan Pemerintah Di Arbitrase ICSID,” PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) 1, no. 3 (2014);
L Lin and J R Alison, “An Analysis of Expropriation and Nationalization Risk in China,” Yale Journal of International Law (1994);
Martti Koskenniemi and Ville Kari, Sovereign Equality, The UN Friendly Relations Declaration at 50, 2020.
S P Subedi, “Fundamental Principles of International Economic Law,” International Economic Law, no. December (2006).
Prof Maxi Schererni, Scherer, Maxi and Prasad,The Principle of Equal Treatment in International Arbitration. Queen Mary, University of London, Centre for Commercial Law Studies, 2019,
M. Iman Santoso, “Kedaulatan Dan Yurisdiksi Negara Dalam Sudut Pandang Keimigrasian,” Binamulia Hukum 7, no. 1 (2018).
Michail Risvas, “Non-Discrimination in International Law and Sovereign Equality of States: An Historical Perspective,” SSRN Electronic Journal (2018). Vol. 39:1.
Nindyo Pramono, Perkembangan Arus Investasi Ditinjau Dan Perspektif Hukum Bisnis, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol. 3. Jakarta, Ditjen Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Departemen Hokum Dan HAM RI, 2006.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Fair And Equitable Treatment Standard In International Investment Law, “OECD Working Papers on International Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law” (2004). working papers on international investment Number 2004/3, 2014.
Sri Setianingsih, “Pengertian Hukum Internasional,” ISBN 9789790118751, Tangerang Selatan:Universitas Terbuka, 2019.
Yeni Kustiyahningsih and Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, “Prosiding Seminar Nasional Multi Disiplin Ilmu & Call For Papers Unisbank ( SENDI _ U ) KE-2 Tahun 2016 Kajian Multi Disiplin Ilmu Dalam Pengembangan IPTEKS Untuk Mewujudkan Pembanguna,” no. November (2020).

Internet
Haris Azhar, SH, MA, Equality Before the Law dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia, Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Gunung Jati, https://lokataru.id/equality-before-the-law-dalam-sistem-peradilan-di-indonesia/ ,akses tanggal 16 agustus 2022, jam 10.00
Marcelo Kohen, General Principles of Law, oxford university press, 2019 https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199796953/obo-9780199796953-0063.xml, akses tanggal 16 agustus 2022, jam 9.45
Yang Zewei, The Legal Effect of the Principle of Sovereign Equality of States, Wuhan University institute of international law, http://translaw.whu.edu.cn/en/index.php/index-view-aid-679.html, akses tanggal 9 Agustus 2022, jam 14:43.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-31

Issue

Section

Articles