Rock Physics Modeling and Seismic Interpretation to Estimate Shally Cemented Zone in Carbonate Reservoir Rock

  • Handoyo Handoyo Geophysical Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, South Lampung, Indonesia
  • M Rizki Sudarsana Geophysics, Universitas Padjajaran, West Java, Indonesia
  • Restu Almiati Geophysical Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, South Lampung, Indonesia

Abstract

Carbonate rock are important hydrocarbon reservoir rocks with complex texture and petrophysical properties (porosity and permeability). These complexities make the prediction reservoir characteristics (e.g. porosity and permeability) from their seismic properties more difficult. The goal of this paper are to understanding the relationship of physical properties and to see the signature carbonate initial rock and shally-carbonate rock from the reservoir.


To understand the relationship between the seismic, petrophysical and geological properties, we used rock physics modeling from ultrasonic P- and S- wave velocity that measured from log data. The measurements obtained from carbonate reservoir field (gas production). X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscope studies shown the reservoir rock are contain wackestone-packstone content. Effective medium theory to rock physics modeling are using Voigt, Reuss, and Hill.


 It is shown the elastic moduly proposionally decrease with increasing porosity. Elastic properties and wave velocity are decreasing proporsionally with increasing porosity and shally cemented on the carbonate rock give higher elastic properties than initial carbonate non-cemented. Rock physics modeling can separated zones which rich of shale and less of shale.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Anselmetti, F. S., and Eberli, G. P., 1997, Sonic velocity in carbonate sediments and rocks; in Palaz, I., and Marfurt, K.J., Eds., Carbonate Seismology: Soc. Expl. Geophys., Tulsa, 53-74.
[2] Avseth, P., and Mavko, G., 1995, The influence of diagenesis on the acoustic properties of grain-supported siliciclastic sedimentary rocks: Annual Meeting, Stanford Rock Physics and Borehole Geophysics Project, 58, Paper B1.
[3] Bryant, S., and Raikes, S., 1995, Prediction of elastic-wave velocities in sandstones using structural models: Geophysics, 60, 437-446.
[4] Dvorkin, J., and Nur, A., 1996, Elasticity of High-Porosity Sandstones: Theory for Two North Sea Datasets, Geophysics, 61, 1363-1370.
[5] Jizba, D., 1991, Mechanical and Acoustical Properties of Sandstones and Shales: Ph.D.-Thesis, Stanford University.
[6] Mavko, G., and Nur, A., 2009. The Rock Physics Handbook, Second Edition Tools for Seismic Analysis of Porous Media. Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK
[7] Sukmono, S. 2002. Seismic Inversion and AVO Analysis for Reservoir. Program Studi Teknik Geofisika ITB. Bandung. Indonesia.
[8] Vernik, L., 1994, Predicting lithology and transport properties from acoustic velocities based on petrophysical classification of siliciclastics. Geophysics, 59, 420-427.
Published
2016-12-01
How to Cite
HANDOYO, Handoyo; SUDARSANA, M Rizki; ALMIATI, Restu. Rock Physics Modeling and Seismic Interpretation to Estimate Shally Cemented Zone in Carbonate Reservoir Rock. Journal of Geoscience, Engineering, Environment, and Technology, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 45-50, dec. 2016. ISSN 2541-5794. Available at: <http://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/JGEET/article/view/6>. Date accessed: 21 sep. 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.24273/jgeet.2016.11.6.